If it weren’t for people, freeways would be fine!

 Wherever they’re built, new highways disrupt currently existing patterns, both of nature and human society. This is especially true in urban center because of the density of population, value of existing properties, and complexity of the infrastructure.

Recognizing this fact, Earl Swift (photo on the left) entitles the last section of his book “The Human Obstacle.” Although he describes the nationwide challenge of routing freeways through cities, he uses Baltimore as his principal example of inevitable conflict with many innocent people bearing the burden.

Regardless of the benefits that urban freeways bring to a city as a whole, these massive thoroughfares carry a heavy human price. It is not at all clear in Baltimore or any of the other cities discussed in The Big Roads that the benefits equal or outweigh the negatives.

Every time I drive along I-5 through Vancouver and Portland, I brood over this dilemma. And I find myself inclined to abandon this vehicular sewer (except for the interstate bridges over the Columbia River, which are the only way to get across) in favor of the old arterials: Interstate Avenue (once U. S. 99W) and Martin Luther King, Jr., Boulevard (U.S. 99E).

As he concludes his book, Swift offers additional observations to my dark meditations. One of them is the fact that this largest public work in American history is rapidly falling apart because of heavy use and old age. Just one aspect of the problem is that most bridges in the freeway system are less than a decade away from reaching their expected useful life of fifty years.

Swift cites estimates that it will take $225 billion a year for fifty years to renew the freeway system—and this at a time when for several reasons the revenue base is shrinking.

Throughout his book, Swift describes the way that these new highways cause old travel-oriented, once-thriving local communities to dry up. America is littered with the ghosts of these places of human habitation whose lifeblood the freeways have sucked up.

What do we get in return? Faster travel times and lower accident rates, both desirable factors. But we also get a uniform and bland experience in sameness. Travelers can get on the freeway in Connecticut and get off in California and nothing changes—the same gas stations, motels, and restaurants serve us all along the way.

“The interstates,” Swift tells us, “take a distillation of the broad American culture—a one-size-fits-all, lowest-common-denominator reading of who we are and what we want—wherever they go.”

The pressures upon the freeway system actually make it possible to believe that segments of it may actually be abandoned, leaving the nation with a massive white elephant. More hopeful is the possibility that we will become more inventive in coming years with respect to transportation policy, highway design, and public financing.

It’s likely to be a long wait. In the meantime, I’m going to revel in the old ways, cycling through town and country on humankind’s “most benevolent of machines.”

Advertisements

2 Responses to If it weren’t for people, freeways would be fine!

  1. Marshall Watkins says:

    When I first entered the world of educational administration I was an employee of Lake Oswego, Oregon, School District. This was in the late ’60s. To do any studies I had to find a comparison district. Parkrose, Oregon was a good match–similar size in population, one high school, comparable socio-economic status–a good fit. The comparison vanished when I-205 skirted Lake Oswego and split Parkrose. Gutting Parkrose with a cement river of traffic destroyed the economic base of the community and the economic base and it’s leaders vanished.
    Kruse way and it’s extension Oregon 217 was planned to continue through Lake Oswego and connect across the Willamette River with US 99E. Similarly I-205 was planned to extend to the west and north of I-5 in Tualatin to provide a west-side bypass. Both Lake Oswego and Tualatin blocked the development, learning from Parkrose.
    Nobody seems to miss the continuation of 217 but a westside bypass providing an alternative to the Boone Bridge over the Willamette in Wilsonville continues to simmer.

    • Marshall, thank you for your historical note. I am familiar with the story about stopping the Mt. Hood freeway and getting light rail in exchange, but I hadn’t heard about Parkrose and Lake Oswego. Even though I suffer from the constant glut of the I-5 Interstate Bridge, I’m apprehensive about the impact that a new bridge will have upon life in downtown Vancouver and on Hayden Island. As for a continuation of a bypass down your way, all that it will do is multiply traffic, destroy the livability of portions of the existing community, and create the need a generation from now of new bypasses to deal with the traffic. I’m a non-believer in new freeways.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: