City cycling for the “modern gal”

May 20, 2013

Dailey

For over a decade, Katie Dailey has bicycled around London, “one of the most congested and overpopulated cities in the world.” Despite countless hours dealing with the hazards of cycling in an urban area, she still doesn’t know “why anyone uses any other mode of transport to get anywhere.”

What surprises her is that in rush hour when she looks around she’s “almost always the only girl.” On weekends, “there are plenty of ladies riding around,” but “hardly any on the busy roads when there’s traffic about.”

Heels on Wheels is a breezy little book addressed to “the modern gal who would like to get back in the saddle after a short (or very long) hiatus.” It is guaranteed, the publisher’s blurb declares, “to make you fall in love with cycling all over again.”

The six chapter headings indicate the range of topics that Daily cycles through: Getting Started, How To Incorporate Cycling Into Your Lifestyle, Cycling Safely, Parking (Or How To Ensure Your Bike Isn’t Stolen), ‘Just One last Question…’, and Bike Maintenance.

More important than the range of issues is the way that Dailey treats the subjects:

  • She writes in a trimmed down, casual, almost flippant style, with much of her phrasing drawn from what I presume is the slang style of the modern English gal. She is determined to avoid sounding like someone who represents the bicycling culture.
  • She deals with basic issues such as choosing a bike that is suitable for women who want to ride comfortably, safely, and efficiently while traveling around doing ordinary things like going to work and shopping.
  • Dailey explains some aspects about cycling that might be hard to understand, such as why “big, squashy seats aren’t necessarily more comfortable – the saddle that has given me the least grief in a decade of city cycling is shaped like a stork’s beak and is as hard as nails.”
  • She cuts through some of the issues that arise by flat out stating her opinion as being right, thereby dismissing other ideas on the subject. Dailey is not the only writer on cycling subjects who adopts this same strategy (most of them men). Strongly opinionated myself, I agree with some of the assertions by all of these writers and disagree with others. My disagreements with Dailey may be caused, in part, because I’m a traditional American guy who rides hard rather than a modern English gal, who rides around town all of the time.

Dailey’s chapter on riding safely states a point of view that is clear, firm, and right for all cyclists who are old enough to cycle on city streets and other public roads. “The key way to be safe on the road as a cyclist is to be as visible and assertive as you can possibly be.

“Recent studies have suggested women are more likely to get hit on the roads because we cycle prudently and unassertively – tucking ourselves into the pavement where we can’t be seen and hanging back at traffic lights.”

She counsels her readers: “Position yourself at the front of the traffic at lights and never, EVER pavement hug when it comes to a turn as you simply won’t be seen by big vehicles turning left [which American readers should translate as “right”].

As the above quotation and note illustrate, the chapter on cycling safely, which I find to be forthright and correct in its major content, is written for English readers who drive on the left side of the streets. Dailey explains that the book “is written from a leftie point of view, i.e. right hand drivers on the left-hand side of the road. Simply reverse the instructions if you drive on the right.”

If publishers want American gals to make full use of the book, they should publish an edition that does the reversing so that the readers don’t have to. An American edition would benefit from translation of some of the slang into language more likely to be understood and appreciated by modern gals whose English is common, everyday American.

Because Dailey writes for women, she discusses several topics that do not pertain to men—cycling when pregnant and cycling in skirts and high heels, for example.

Even so the book has much to offer to the modern guy who has been thinking that he ought to get back to biking. The book reads quickly, and guys as well as gals will be helped as they try to choose a “trusty steed, stay safe on the road, fix a puncture and select the best lock” for their bicycles.”


Jottings from the notebook of an aggressive cyclist

March 10, 2011

Great Allegheny Passage / C & O Canal Towpath

One of the most interesting bicycle expeditions in the country is the off road trail all of the way from Washington, D.C. to the outskirts of Pittsburgh, 335 miles of non-paved, close to level, peaceful cycling. The best way to prepare for a week on the GAP—C & O is to study the TrailBook published every year by the Great Allegheny Press in Pittsburgh and Cumberland. It contains 224 pages of illustrated information about the trail, the nearby towns, American history that has been made along this passage through American history, travel preparations, and facilities and accommodations for cyclists. One of its best features is a splendid, detailed map—with the GAP on one side and the C & O on the other.

When I rode this route in the summer of 2010, I didn’t know about this book and pieced together some of the information from independent study. My advice: By all means get the TrailBook. It will be the best $10 that you’ll spend to make this trip a strong and good experience.

Also advised (or at least suggested): read my columns that describe the trip I made on this trail. The blogs begin on May 26 with a post entitled Bicycling the Potomac River with George .

Women on Wheels–bicycling

Millie Magner is a perceptive, dependable, and interesting reporter of bicycling in the urban context. Her Seattle-based commentary regularly appears on Examiner.com. Her March 9 column “Women on Wheels—bicycling is a perceptive discussion of a topic that should be important to cyclists in cities all across the United States. The first paragraph and link to the rest of the article are posted below.

“According to Susan B. Anthony, “the bicycle has done more for the emancipation of women than anything else in the world.”   Anthony’s statement seems to lend its truth to this day.  There are efforts currently throughout the world, especially targeting Africa, to get girls on bicycles.  World Bicycle Relief proclaims on their website, “In the hands of a girl, [a] bike is independence, education and economic self-sufficiency. In the hands of 50,000 Zambian schoolchildren, [a] bike is the promise of a better life for entire communities and generations to come.”  However, does this only ring true in developing countries?  What is happening in the rest of the world and right here in Seattle? Continue reading on Examiner.com: Women on Wheels – bicycling – Seattle Bicycle Transportation | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/bicycle-transportation-in-seattle/women-on-wheels-bicycling?CID=examiner_alerts_article#ixzz1G9GZ08Cd

Why Do Such Smart People Ride So Hard? PAC Tour’s Desert Camp 2011

In a few days, I will join fifty seemingly smart people who will spend a week bicycling up to 100 miles a day in the southern Arizona desert for the fun of it. We’ll be doing week five of PAC Tour’s Desert Camp 2011. How could such hard work be fun, some people ask me? Why do you find it so satisfying? I can mutter a few words in answer but have decided to ask a few people to help me come up with a good explanation.

Ten or twelve people on the week I will be riding have been on one or more of the PAC Tour expeditions I have done in previous years. I hope to talk with some of them and make notes on their experiences as aggressive cyclists. If all goes well, these conversations will be featured in forthcoming Thursday columns.

Cycling the St. John’s Bridge (part two)

Mardi Gras was an unexpected half-sunny and warm day in otherwise gray Portland and Vancouver. Since I had to travel to Portland for a dental appointment, I decided to continue training for the forthcoming week in Arizona by doing my Skyline Boulevard route. This takes me over the St. Johns Bridge (see last week’s column).

After last week’s scary ride on the sidewalk, I stayed on the main road where I usually travel. Despite the vehicular traffic that I described last week, I felt safe and secure. Two other cyclists were crossing the bridge at the same time, one going in each direction, both dressed (as I was) in bicycle-specific clothing. They looked to be seasoned roadies. And they were on the sidewalk. To each his own.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 319 other followers